Thank you IRS! IRS Website Provides links to Tax Code, Regulations and Official Guidance

For those of us who practice in the tax arena, getting access to the Internal Revenue Code ("IRC"), Treasury Regulations, and other official guidance is usually not a problem.

However, for the average person who wants to look up a specific IRC section they've heard about (e.g., section 1221 which defines a "capital asset" in determining whether a disposition of an asset gives rise to a capital gain or loss), it's often a frustrating task.  And let's not even get started on where they can find Treasury Regulations or various IRS pronouncements (like IRS Revenue Rulings).

Thankfully, the IRS in an effort to make the increasingly-complex tax law more accessible to the public, has created a resource that puts a portal to these authorities right on its website at http://www.irs.gov/taxpros/article/0,,id=98137,00.html.

Moreover, it has even provided a page entitled Understanding IRS Guidance - A Brief Primer that explains the relevance of a number of different types of authorities. Since it's fairly brief (just like the title), I've reproduced it here:

For anyone not familiar with the inner workings of tax administration, the array of IRS guidance may seem, well, a little puzzling at first glance. To take a little of the mystery away, here's a brief look at seven of the most common forms of guidance.

In its role in administering the tax laws enacted by the Congress, the IRS must take the specifics of these laws and translate them into detailed regulations, rules and procedures. The Office of Chief Counsel fills this crucial role by producing several different kinds of documents and publications that provide guidance to taxpayers, firms and charitable groups.

Regulation
A regulation is issued by the Internal Revenue Service and Treasury Department to provide guidance for new legislation or to address issues that arise with respect to existing Internal Revenue Code sections. Regulations interpret and give directions on complying with the law. Regulations are published in the Federal Register. Generally, regulations are first published in proposed form in a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). After public input is fully considered through written comments and even a public hearing, a final regulation or a temporary regulation is published as a Treasury Decision (TD), again, in the Federal Register.

Revenue Ruling
A revenue ruling is an official interpretation by the IRS of the Internal Revenue Code, related statutes, tax treaties and regulations. It is the conclusion of the IRS on how the law is applied to a specific set of facts. Revenue rulings are published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin for the information of and guidance to taxpayers, IRS personnel and tax professionals. For example, a revenue ruling may hold that taxpayers can deduct certain automobile expenses.

Revenue Procedure
A revenue procedure is an official statement of a procedure that affects the rights or duties of taxpayers or other members of the public under the Internal Revenue Code, related statutes, tax treaties and regulations and that should be a matter of public knowledge. It is also published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. While a revenue ruling generally states an IRS position, a revenue procedure provides return filing or other instructions concerning an IRS position. For example, a revenue procedure might specify how those entitled to deduct certain automobile expenses should compute them by applying a certain mileage rate in lieu of calculating actual operating expenses.

Private Letter Ruling
A private letter ruling, or PLR, is a written statement issued to a taxpayer that interprets and applies tax laws to the taxpayer's specific set of facts. A PLR is issued to establish with certainty the federal tax consequences of a particular transaction before the transaction is consummated or before the taxpayer's return is filed. A PLR is issued in response to a written request submitted by a taxpayer and is binding on the IRS if the taxpayer fully and accurately described the proposed transaction in the request and carries out the transaction as described. A PLR may not be relied on as precedent by other taxpayers or IRS personnel. PLRs are generally made public after all information has been removed that could identify the taxpayer to whom it was issued.

Technical Advice Memorandum
A technical advice memorandum, or TAM, is guidance furnished by the Office of Chief Counsel upon the request of an IRS director or an area director, appeals, in response to technical or procedural questions that develop during a proceeding. A request for a TAM generally stems from an examination of a taxpayer's return, a consideration of a taxpayer's claim for a refund or credit, or any other matter involving a specific taxpayer under the jurisdiction of the territory manager or the area director, appeals. Technical Advice Memoranda are issued only on closed transactions and provide the interpretation of proper application of tax laws, tax treaties, regulations, revenue rulings or other precedents. The advice rendered represents a final determination of the position of the IRS, but only with respect to the specific issue in the specific case in which the advice is issued. Technical Advice Memoranda are generally made public after all information has been removed that could identify the taxpayer whose circumstances triggered a specific memorandum.

Notice
A notice is a public pronouncement that may contain guidance that involves substantive interpretations of the Internal Revenue Code or other provisions of the law. For example, notices can be used to relate what regulations will say in situations where the regulations may not be published in the immediate future.

Announcement
An announcement is a public pronouncement that has only immediate or short-term value. For example, announcements can be used to summarize the law or regulations without making any substantive interpretation; to state what regulations will say when they are certain to be published in the immediate future; or to notify taxpayers of the existence of an approaching deadline.

Page Last Reviewed or Updated [by IRS]: October 06, 2010

Unrealized Built-in Gains and Losses Under Section 382 and the Tax Accounting Rules

Originally published in The Tax Adviser, November 2010  [http://www.aicpa.org/Publications/TaxAdviser/2010/November/Pages/clinic_nov10-story-10.aspx]

Many practitioners already know that section 382 generally limits the use of a corporation’s net operating losses (NOLs) in cases where there is an increase in ownership of more than 50 percentage points by one or more 5% shareholders during a three-year testing period.

Many practitioners also know that section 382 addresses cases in which corporations have either net unrealized built-in gains (NUBIGs) or net unrealized built-in losses (NUBILs) as of the ownership change date. In such cases, under section 382(h) generally,

1. For corporations with NUBIGs, a year’s section 382 limitation is increased by recognized built-in gains for that year during the five-year recognition period following the change or
2. For corporations with NUBILs, recognized built-in losses for a year during the five-year recognition period following the change are treated as if they were pre-change NOLs.

Section 382(h)(3)(A) defines the terms NUBIG and NUBIL as the amounts by which the fair market value (FMV) of the corporation’s assets immediately before an ownership change is more or less, respectively, than the aggregate adjusted basis of such assets at such time.

Interestingly, what practitioners and taxpayers sometimes do not consider is section 382(h)(6)(C)’s requirement that NUBIGs and NUBILs must generally be further adjusted for items of accrued income and accrued deductions attributable to the pre-change period (to the extent not already recognized as of the change date).

This provision can yield unexpected results (sometimes good, sometimes bad). As shown in Example 1, it can mean that a corporation that at first appears to have a NUBIL might actually have a NUBIG. Alternatively (as shown in Example 2 below), given a seemingly minor factual difference, it can mean a corporation that at first appears not to have a NUBIL might not be able to avoid having one.

Example 1: All amounts are determined as of the change date (December 31, year 1). Legal settlement accrual is reasonably ascertainable in amount but is not agreed to or paid until January 5, year 2 (i.e., neither the all-events test of section 461(h)(4) nor economic performance per section 461(h)(1) is met as of the change date).

The corporation has a net unrealized built-in gain of $1.7 million, computed as follows (see exhibit below):

• Intangible: The FMV exceeds the basis by $2 million.
• Land: The basis exceeds the FMV by $300,000.
• Accrued legal settlement (related to a tort): This $3 million amount is excluded from the calculation because it did not represent a proper accrual (aside from required economic performance) as of the change date. Therefore, it is not treated as being attributable to the pre-change period and is not a component of any NUBIG or NUBIL.

Example 2: All amounts are determined as of the change date (December 31, year 1). Legal settlement accrual is reasonably ascertainable in amount and is agreed to but is not paid until January 5, year 2 (i.e., the all-events test is met as of the change date, with economic performance occurring after the change date). Pre-change NOLs are $500,000. The section 382 limitation is $1 million.

The corporation has a net unrealized built-in loss of $1.3 million, computed as follows (see exhibit below):

• Intangible: The FMV exceeds the basis by $2 million.
• Land: The basis exceeds the FMV by $300,000.
• Accrued legal settlement (related to a tort): This $3 million amount is included in the calculation because the deduction was a proper accrual at the change date under the all-events test but was deferred until paid under section 461(h)(2)(C). Therefore, it is treated as being attributable to the pre-change period and is a component of any NUBIG or NUBIL.

This means that the deduction (to the extent of the NUBIL of $1.3 million) is lumped together with the corporation’s pre-change NOLs and (in this case) is subject to the section 382 limitation as a realized built-in loss.

Exhibit

	Tax Basis	Fair Market Value	Difference
Assets
Intangible	0	2,000,000	2,000,000
Land	2,000,000	1,700,000	(300,000)
Liabilities
Accrued legal settlement (tort)			(3,000,000)

Using the numbers above, there would be a post-change deemed NOL of $1.8 million (pre-change losses of $500,000 plus $1.3 million of realized built-in losses), which could only offset income in the subsequent year (December 31, year 2) of up to the $1 million section 382 limitation, with the remainder ($800,000) of the disallowed realized built-in losses being carried forward under the rules applicable to NOLs.

While these two examples are admittedly simple (and focus only on accrued deductions), they do make one thing clear—corporate tax practitioners must pay close attention not only to the unrealized gains and losses inherent in a corporation’s assets when facing a section 382 limitation, but also to those less-obvious items of accrued income and expense. In fact, the author was approached about a year ago by another practitioner on a matter fairly similar to Example 1 above, where the numbers were many times higher than those given here. As a result, what initially looked like a large NUBIL instead turned out to be a substantial NUBIG, much to the relief of all involved.

Bottom line: Don't forget to consider the tax accounting method rules (for accrued income or expense items) when dealing with section 382.